HIGH LEVEL RESEARCH METHODS FOR INFORMATION COLLECTION

Get Complete Project Material File(s) Now! »

Post Ward-round Process (PWRP)

Post ward-round process (PWRP) is held to take some time out with the multidisciplinary team and made discussion some of the tasks have to taken in the patient’s treatment process [5]. In post ward-round, where senior practitioners advice to the junior and medical students, what you have seen during the ward-round, what think about the case studies in ward-round session having no too much ambitions [5]. Post ward-round process (PWRP), invites the junior practitioners and medical students to suggest and evaluate the current patient’s illness status and attempt to propose optimal solution with strong arguments for quality patient’s treatment and junior’s learning perspective.

Designated team 4:
These groups of personnel are used to take ware-round process (WRP) activities as follows:
? Senior Practioners
? Junior Practitioners
? Medical Students
? Occupational Therapists
The description of the designated team4 can be seen in the figure-27 and figure-28 respectively.
1. Tasks
1. Group discussion for evaluating current analysis of patient’s illness.
2. Activities
There are the certain activities which helpful for achieving the above task.
1. To take time out after the ward-round session with multidisciplanary team to evalute the curretn patient’s illness in post-ward session [5].
2. For junior staff: junior practitioners and medical students need to propose optimal solution with strong arguments to convince seniors for quality patient’s treatment process.
3. To improve the communication gaps between the junior participants and senior participants during the post ward-round session.
4. To debating pros and cons of various diagnostic and management options to support quality care for patient’s treatment [27].
5. To comapre the cureent case studies with the reference legacy cases for help out in medication’s decision making [27].
6. To deciding on the next steps for patient management and evaluate all the treatment options for patinet’s treatment process [27].
7. To hightlitght what are the needs necessary in relation to each patient during treatment [27].
3. Roles
1. Junior staff: Junior practitioners and medical students take participation to evaluate the current patient’s illness in post-ward process.
2. Junior staff: Junior practitioners and medical students propose optimal solution with strong arguments to convince seniors for quality patient’s treatment process.
3. Medical students are responsible to make comparision between legacy case studies and current case studies related to concerning subject during the post-ward process.
4. Seniors are responsible for taking decision on the next steps or patient management and different treatment options.

4. Goals
These following goals can be traced out from the literature and modeling workshop [27]:
1. To promote quality group discussion for current case study analysis.
a. To give promotion to support open discussion among the multidisciplanary professionals in patient’s treatment process [27].
b. To imporve the communication gaps between juniors staff and senior staff for maximum learning and confidence in patient’s treatment.
c. To take vibrant decisions to get quality health care services for patient’s treatment.
5. Competence
1. Senior practitioners need Language competence [32] (Language: Swedish, English) and Educational competence [32] (MD; MDCM, Cand.med, DO [70]), work_Experience competence [32] (5-6 years) responsible for taking decisions on the next steps or patient management and different treatment options.
2. Junior practitioners need Language competence [32] (Language: Swedish, English) and Educational competence [32] (MD; MDCM, Cand.med [70]), work_Experience competence [32](2-3 years) to take participation to evaluate current patient’s illness in post-ward process.
3. Medical students need Language competence [32](Language: Swedish, English) and Educational competence [32] (MSPAS [70]), work_Experience competence [32] (biginner) are responsible to make comparision between legacy case studies and

READ The characteristics of Resheph and the named angels in Israelite religion

1 Introduction
1.1 BACKGROUND
1.2 PROBLEM
1.3 PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES
1.4 ASSUMPTION
1.5 DEMARCATION
1.6 THESIS OUTLINE
1.7 TIME PLAN
1.8 SYSTEMATIC WORKING PLAN
1.9 FINAL REMARKS
2 Theoretical Background
2.1. DIMENSIONS OF INFORMATION LOGISTICS
2.2. WARD ROUND
2.1.1 Why Look At Ward Round? .
2.1.2 Aspects of Ward-rounds
2.3. ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
2.4. ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES
2.5. ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT IN HEALTHCARE
2.5.1. Workflow and Data Exchange in Healthcare
2.5.2. Adaptive Workflow System (AWS)
2.5.3. Process and Resource Model (PRM)
2.6. APPROACHES USED TO MODEL ONTOLOGIES IN HEALTHCARE
2.7. EXISTING ONTOLOGIES IN HEALTHCARE
2.8. ONTOLOGY REUSABILITY 7
2.9. FINAL REMARKS
3. Research Methodological Approach
3.1. TYPES OF RESEARCH METHODS
3.2. HIGH LEVEL RESEARCH METHODS FOR INFORMATION COLLECTION
3.3. LOW LEVEL RESEARCH METHOD FOR RESEARCH DESIGN
3.3.1. CONSTITUTE OF MIXED METHOD RESEARCH DESIGN PROCESS (MM)
3.3.1.1. Action Research
3.3.1.2. Action Research Implication Steps
3.3.2. Constructive Research
3.3.2.1. Constructive Research Implication Steps.
3.4. Phases of Mixed-Method Research Design
3.5. LOW LEVEL RESEARCH METHOD FOR ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
3.5.1. Hybrid Methodology for Ontology Development (HM)
3.5.2. Development Activities
3.6. METHODS FOR EVALUATION AND VALIDITY OF RESEARCH DESIGN
3.7. DOCUMENTATION
3.8. MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
3.9. PHASES OF HYBRID METHODOLOGY FOR ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
3.10. ONTOLOGY DEVELOPMENT WORK-FLOW MODEL
3.11. FINAL REMARKS .
4 Realization of Ward-round
4.1. WARD-ROUND
4.2. TRADITION WARD-ROUND
4.3. MODERNITY WARD-ROUND
4.4. OBJECTIVE OF WARD-ROUND
4.5. CRITERIA FOR ADMISSION PROCEDURE (AP)
4.5.1. Steps are involved in Normal/Routine Admission Process
4.5.2. Steps are involved in Emergency Admission Process
4.6. COMPETENCE SELECTION CRITERIA
4.7. CONCEPTUAL MODEL
4.8. WARD-ROUND PROCESSES .
4.9. PRE WARD-ROUND PROCESS (PRWP)
4.10. WARD ROUND PROCESS (WRP)
4.11. POST WARD-ROUND PROCESS (PWRP)
4.12. FINAL REMARKS
5. Results
5.1. MODELLING WORKSHOPS
5.2. PROPOSED ONTOLOGY BASED MODEL FOR WARD-ROUND
5.3. HIGH LEVEL ONTOLOGY BASED MODE FOR WARD-ROUND
5.4. DETAIL ONTOLOGY BASED MODEL FOR WARD-ROUND
5.5. MEDICAL STAFF
5.6. ROLE
5.7. ORGANIZATION
5.8. RESOURCES
5.9. COMPETENCE
5.10. PROCESS
5.11. GOALS
5.12. ACTIVITIES
5.13. MAIN SCENARIO MODELLING
5.14. IMPLEMENTATION OF ONTOLOGY MODEL/RESULTS
6. Conclusion and Future Work
7. References .
8. Appendix